But there are also staunch defenders of the Electoral College who, though perhaps less vocal than its critics, offer very powerful arguments in its favor. Arguments Against the Electoral College Those who object to the Electoral College system and favor a direct popular election of the president generally do so on four grounds:
The Court is asked once again to consider whether the race-conscious admissions program at the University of Texas is lawful under the Equal Protection Clause. I The University of Texas at Austin or University relies upon a complex system of admissions that has undergone significant evolution over the past two decades.
In assessing applicants, preference was given to racialminorities. Inthe Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit invalidated this admissions system, holding that any consideration of race in college admissions violates the Equal Protection Clause.
One year later the University adopted a new admissions policy. The PAI was a numerical score based on a holistic review of an application.
The Texas Legislature responded to Hopwood as well. As its name suggests, the Top Ten Percent Law guarantees college admission to students who graduate from a Texas high school in the top 10 percent of their class.
Those students may choose to attend any of the public universities in the State. The University used this admissions system untilwhen this Court decided the companion cases of Grutter v. The University concluded that its admissions policy was not providing these benefits. After the board approved the proposal, the University adopted a new admissions policy to implement it.
The University has continued to use that admissions policy to this day. Today, up to 75 percent of the places in the freshman class are filled through the Plan.
The University did adopt an approach similar to the one in Grutter for the remaining 25 percent or so of the incoming class. This portion of the class continues to be admitted based on a combination of their AI and PAI scores. Now, however, race is given weight as a subfactor within the PAI.
The PAI is a number from 1 to 6 6 is the best that is based on two primary components.
Chapter Canons of Professional Ethics and Conduct § Fidelity. A real estate broker or salesperson, while acting as an agent for another, is a fiduciary. The Education Issues Page is a discussion of what's wrong with public education in America today, with an emphasis on the liberalism and political correctness involved in public education. The quality of education is going down while the price keeps going up. Making Sense of the Higher Ed Debate. When they talk about what's wrong with higher education, President Obama, reformers and professors are often speaking different languages, writes Johann Neem. to produce more degrees at a cheaper cost. Where others might consider deeper questions of virtues and practices, the president wants the outcome.
The first component is the average score a reader gives the applicant on two required essays. Both the essay readers and the full-file readers who assign applicants their PAI undergo extensive training to ensure that they are scoring applicants consistently.
Deposition of Brian Breman 9—14, Record in No. Both the intensive training and the reliability analyses aim to ensure that similarly situated applicants are being treated identically regardless of which admissions officer reads the file.
Race enters the admissions process, then, at one stage and one stage only—the calculation of the PAS. Furthermore, consideration of race is contextual and does not operate as a mechanical plus factor for underrepresented minorities.
|Watchtower Document Archives||University of Phoenix is a business just like all schools. Of course the admission specialists are working to get you enrolled and get that money, but what you have to remember is that you are going to pay for your degree regardless of where you decide to pursue your degree.|
|University of Phoenix Reviews - Online Degree Reviews||Our purpose in presenting these Corp. The District of Columbia Act of incorporated the municipal government of the District of Columbia into a municipal corporation.|
|Purdue OWL // Purdue Writing Lab||The entire course syllabus is a disaster and meant to create issues and confrontation.|
She was not in the top 10 percent of her high school class, so she was evaluated for admission through holistic, full-file review. This Court granted certiorari and vacated the judgment of the Court of Appeals, Fisher v. This Court granted certiorari for a second time, U.
Fisher I set forth these controlling principles, while taking no position on the constitutionality of the admissions program at issue in this case.
On remand, the Court of Appeals determined that the program conformed with the strict scrutiny mandated by Fisher I. Unlike other approaches to college admissions considered by this Court, it combines holistic review with a percentage plan.
This approach gave rise to an unusual consequence in this case: Because petitioner did not graduate in the top 10 percent of her high school class, she was categorically ineligible for more than three-fourths of the slots in the incoming freshman class.
It seems quite plausible, then, to think that petitioner would have had a better chance of being admitted to the University if the school used race-conscious holistic review to select its entire incoming class, as was the case in Grutter. For that reason, throughout this litigation, the Top Ten Percent Plan has been taken, somewhat artificially, as a given premise.
In particular, it has led to a record that is almost devoid of information about the students who secured admission to the University through the Plan. The Court thus cannot know how students admitted solely based on their class rank differ in their contribution to diversity from students admitted through holistic review.
In an ordinary case, this evidentiary gap perhaps could be filled by a remand to the district court for further factfinding. If the Court were to remand, therefore, further factfinding would be limited to a narrow 3-year sample, review of which might yield little insight.
Furthermore, as discussed above, the University lacks any authority to alter the role of the Top Ten Percent Plan in its admissions process.Dylan Matthews writes a critique of effective altruism. There is much to challenge in it, and some has already been challenged by people like Ryan Carey. Perhaps I will go into it at more length later.
But for now I want to discuss a specific argument of Matthews’. He writes – and I am editing. In my last post I discussed at length the question of rationality.
I concluded that contrary to the opinion of behavioral economics, humans do make decisions that they believe to be in their best interests, in my view the correct definition of a rational decision. Apr 14, · The Argument for Tuition-Free College.
Keith Ellison. April 14, The cost of attending a four-year college has states would commit to reinvesting state funds in higher education. Any public college or university that benefited from the reinvestment program would be required to limit tuition increases. Education in the United States is provided by public, private and home schools..
State governments set overall educational standards, often mandate standardized tests for K–12 public school systems and supervise, usually through a board of regents, state colleges, and universities.
Funding comes from the state, local, and federal government.
Private schools are generally free to determine. The University of Texas at Austin’s undergraduate admissions system offers admission to all students who graduate in the top 10% of their Texas high school . The Education Issues Page is a discussion of what's wrong with public education in America today, with an emphasis on the liberalism and political correctness involved in public education.
The quality of education is going down while the price keeps going up.